The truncation error is the difference between a truncated value and the actual value. In computer applications, the truncation error is the discrepancy that arises when executing a finite number of steps to approximate an infinite process. Truncation error is defined as the difference between the true (analytical) derivative of a function and its derivative obtained by numerical approximation. In numerical analysis and scientific computation, it is the error caused by the approximation of a mathematical process.
For one-step methods, the local truncation error gives us an indication of how the solution to the differential equation does not solve the difference equation. The local truncation error for multi-step methods is similar to that for one-step methods. Truncation errors in the process LCA result from the cutting of missing flows during boundary selection. An advantage of truncation error analysis compared to empirical estimation of convergence rates or detailed analysis of a special problem with a mathematical expression for the numerical solution, is that it reveals the accuracy of the various building blocks in the numerical method and how each building block affects overall accuracy.
Truncation errors are defined as errors that result from using an approximation instead of an exact mathematical procedure. The following text will provide many examples of how to calculate truncation errors for finite difference discretizations of ODE and PDE. In general, it refers to the discrepancy that arises when performing a finite number of steps to approximate a process with infinite steps. For example, glycerin fractionation for PSA production has an estimated truncation error much larger than Cap-xylene production.
The truncation error generally increases as the step size increases, while the rounding error decreases as the step size increases. We will first look at a particular example in detail, and then we will list the truncation error in the most common finite difference approximation formulas. For each increment (k+th (next), the step size is normally estimated according to the truncation error in the kth (current) iteration. Obtain a global truncation error limit for the second-order Adams-Moulton algorithm applied to the problem of Example 13, 13, assuming that the corrector is satisfied exactly after each step.
In Table 1, the truncation error estimated from upstream loss varies depending on the choices of hybridization methods and different technologies. The “truncation error T (x, h) associated with the “predictor stage” of the “Milne—Hamming” method is given by. In this method of error handling, it remains less than a prescribed tolerance, so that it is under control. For example, it originates from comparing numerical methods with a truncated Taylor series.
The error caused by choosing a finite number of rectangles instead of an infinite number is a truncation error in mathematical integration processes.
